Red Flags Run Abundant Before the 2018 Midterms…… Why?

We have one side of the aisle supporters wanting to make America first and great again, and we have the other side of the aisle supporters who would rather surrender their country’s sovereignty, individual freedoms, and abandon the ‘Rule of Law’ because of an outsider non-politician businessman who’s crude, rude, and unpresidential who’s delivering on his promises while at the same time actually making America first and great again in spite of the obstruction, resistance, and do nothing to advance the people’s ‘Will’ as put forth by the American people electoral College landslide victory back in 2016! It’s time for the American People to wake up and check out why they didn’t care to see the obvious Red Flags that have been abundant over the last 8 years of the Obama Administration, and understand how the ‘Deep State’ leadership of the FBI, DOJ, and CIA, along with the covering up and concealing done by the ‘Deep State’ run ‘Paid to Report’ Mainstream Media to protect the joint effort of the ‘Swamp’s’ lawlessness and their bypassing of the Constitution that both sides of the aisle were willing participants of!

We have late night hosts hoping for the crash of the Stock Market!   Why?

We have one of two of the Political Parties that call the shots when it comes to America’s future doing absolutely nothing to advance or adhere to the ‘Rule of Law’ or Constitution!    Why?

We have a Mainstream Media who could care less about reporting the news and facts to the American people because they’ve decided that rating and profits are more important!     Why?

We have an outsider non-politician President being treated like a criminal when everything that’s front, and center being presented to the American people by the ‘Deep State’ run ‘Paid to Report’ Mainstream Media are not considered crimes or even misdemeanors in a court of law!   Why?

We have the once Democratic Party who believed in working through bipartisanship with Republicans to do what’s best for America and the American people, decided to change their spots to that of a third world Socialist run country and for the sake of the world restrict our founding father guaranteed personal rights, for being dependent on government so that America too, can experience the ‘one size fits all’ reality that the rest of the world appears to be living!    Why?

We have the accusation of racism for the excuse of why America doesn’t have a mandatory Federal Voter ID, but care more about the Russians, Russians, and Russians then the Illegals who occupy our country, live in Sanctuary cities, spend our taxpayer dollars to support their every need to the tune of some $115 Billion dollars a year, are automatically registered by ‘Blue’ States to vote when they are now legally allowed to get a driver’s license, and at that time registered to vote automatically!    Why?

Obama was a community leader in Chicago and friends with Rev. Wright, and Bill Ayres, which should have been, but not, a red flag for both sides of the aisle, but it wasn’t!

Chicago was his test case for Alinsky’s Socialist agenda, and he is probably very happy with the discontent and conflicts that undermine the Constitution, and caused Trump to cancel his rally in Chicago during the primaries, and with the help of one George Soros, who paid demonstrators but never held accountable for doing so because the above fore mentioned FBI, DOJ, and CIA were in the bag!

Let’s not forget the ‘Deep State’ run Mainstream Media who protected George Soros’s gang even though they themselves admitted being paid to  protest, which continued with Black Lives Matter, Soros’s Voting machine company that was called out as fraudulent when Ted Cruz won Idaho’s Primary, and with weeks to spare before the 2016 elections discovered to be in 16 Swing States in 300 plus voting districts in those 16 states!

You have to love it though, because every time an act like this occurs, Trump gets more supporters and votes, which is a good thing when you have both political parties and the Media hating one candidate, and that’s because  you have to know at that stage that we have the right guy for the job……especially in politics!!! 

That’s Why!

Six Times the Obama Administration Should Have Appointed Special Counsel    ..Why didn’t they?

What is a special counsel, and why do we have them? According to Wikipedia, “a special prosecutor (or special counsel or independent counsel or independent prosecutor) is a lawyer appointed to investigate, and potentially prosecute, a particular case of suspected wrongdoing for which a conflict of interest exists for the usual prosecuting authority” — i.e., the perceived conflict of interest of Jeff Sessions to investigate alleged collusion of the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election.

Anyway, while liberals are holding out hope for Robert Mueller to find evidence of collusion and force Trump to resign or be impeached, it occurs to me that despite the rampant corruption and scandals-a-plenty of the Obama years that there was never a single special counsel appointed. Not one. Obama supporters point to this as evidence that his administration was above board, but in reality, it was just proof of just how corrupt things were. By limiting investigations to their own sham investigations that saw no one held accountable, or to congressional Republicans whose investigations they could simply stonewall and accuse of being partisan, the Obama administration felt they could keep up the ruse that they were scandal-free. Here are six times the Obama administration should have appointed a special counsel to investigate a scandal but didn’t.   Why? 

The Walpin Firing Scandal 

It’s a pretty big deal when the president of the United States breaks the law to protect his friend and donor who was being investigated for misusing federal grant money… but Barack Obama did just that for his friend, former NBA star and mayor of Sacramento Kevin Johnson. Johnson had taken nearly a million dollars in AmeriCorps grant money to his own nonprofit organization to pay volunteers for political activity. While investigating this, Gerald Walpin, the inspector general for the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS), discovered a cover-up of sexual abuse allegations made by three students against Johnson who were offered some of this grant money as hush money. Walpin recommended criminal charges against Johnson and was quickly told to resign. Walpin refused, and Obama fired him. The firing itself violated a law that Obama co-sponsored as a U.S. senator. Congressional Republicans launched their own investigation, and the Obama White House responded with a smear campaign against Walpin and withheld documents from Congress.   Why?

Benghazi

On September 11, 2012, a group with connections to al Qaeda attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, died. This was just awful timing for Obama. The 2012 presidential election was just weeks away. The cover-up began instantly. An obscure YouTube video was blamed for inciting a “spontaneous” protest even though all the key players knew it was a pre-planned terror attack almost immediately. That didn’t stop Obama and Hillary publicly claiming to the contrary. UN Ambassador Susan Rice went on the weekend talk shows to repeat the lie over and over and over again. Obama was trying to save his reelection, and Hillary her political future as well. Republicans investigated, but the Obama administration stonewalled those investigations, which they branded as partisan witch hunts. An independent special counsel would have made it difficult for the Obama administration to claim the investigation was tainted, so one was not appointed.  Why?

The IRS Scandal

Using the IRS to target Obama’s political enemies during an election year? Obama did try to distance himself from the scandal but according to a report, IRS employees were “acutely” aware that Obama wanted a crackdown on conservative and Tea Party groups, and Douglas Shulman, the IRS commissioner, visited the White House a whopping 157 times (more than anyone in Obama’s cabinet) while the IRS abuses occurred. Gee, do you think there’s a potential conflict of interest here? Unlike other scandals where investigations were left to Republicans in Congress, the Obama administration did investigate the IRS scandal… did you know about this? Yep, Attorney General Eric Holder appointed a DOJ lawyer to run the investigation. Her main qualification was that she was an Obama donor, and within a few short days of her appointment, it was announced the FBI was not planning to file any criminal charges connected to the scandal. Of course not.   Why?

Uranium One

In 2010, the Obama administration approved a deal allowing the sale of 20 percent of America’s uranium to be sold to Russia over Republicans’ expressed national security concerns. The deal was tainted by donations to the Clinton Foundation and an administration cover-up of bribery and racketeering before being approved. The Obama administration threatened an FBI informant to keep him from talking about what he knew. There is currently a congressional investigation underway, but why wasn’t this investigated when it happened? Who was in charge of the FBI when the deal went down? Mr. Robert Mueller. That name should ring a bell with you.  Why?

Fast & Furious

Two thousand firearms sent across the border… hundreds lost… a border agent killed with one of those guns. The Obama administration did everything in their power to stonewall the investigation. Attorney General Eric Holder even claimed to have no knowledge of the operation (an outright lie) and Obama asserted executive privilege to withhold documents from congressional investigators. Conflict of interest, maybe? Absolutely there should have been a special counsel appointed. But if there’s anything I know from researching Obama’s scandalous administration it’s that Obama picked people to run his Department of Justice who were willing to protect him and whom he, in turn, would protect as well.  Why? and Why is it OK for Holder to receive a Contempt of Congress?

The Hillary Clinton Email Scandal

What about this scandal wasn’t tainted? Obama’s former secretary of state and heir apparent to the Oval Office is caught violating federal transparency laws by hosting a private email server—which was only discovered as a result of the Benghazi investigation (which they were also stonewalling). Over 30,000 emails were discovered to have been deleted. Phones were smashed with hammers… Obama personally communicated with Hillary via this private email, with a pseudonym of his own… FBI Director James Comey had drafted Hillary’s exoneration letter before even interviewing her. We now know that FBI investigator Peter Strzok, who was investigating both Hillary and Trump, had personally softened the language on the exoneration statement. Right around the same time, he was telling fellow investigator and lover Lisa Page that he would stop Trump from getting elected president. What difference at this point does it make, right? Everything about that investigation was tainted. A special counsel was needed as soon as the private server was discovered. But, Obama had to protect his heir apparent, and therefore his legacy, and so the investigation was run by pro-Hillary/anti-Trump partisans who had no business doing so.   Why?

***The common thread between these examples is the stonewalling and cover-ups committed by the Obama administration in order to protect itself. Corruption begat more corruption and there was no way they were going to allow an investigation it couldn’t control (or dismiss as partisan) happen. ~~By Matt Margolis August 2, 2018

U.S. Has 3.5 Million More Registered Voters Than Live Adults — A Red Flag for Electoral Fraud?  

Elections:

American democracy has a problem — a voting problem. According to a new study of U.S. Census data, America has more registered voters than actual live voters. It’s a troubling fact that puts our nation’s future in peril.

The data comes from Judicial Watch’s Election Integrity Project. The group looked at data from 2011 to 2015 produced by the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, along with data from the federal Election Assistance Commission.

As reported by the National Review’s Deroy Murdock, who did some numbers-crunching of his own, “some 3.5 million more people are registered to vote in the U.S. than are alive among America’s adult citizens. Such staggering inaccuracy is an engraved invitation to voter fraud.”

Murdock counted Judicial Watch’s state-by-state tally and found that 462 U.S. counties had a registration rate exceeding 100% of all eligible voters. That’s 3.552 million people, who Murdock calls “ghost voters.” And how many people is that? There are 21 states that don’t have that many people.

Nor are these tiny, rural counties or places that don’t have the wherewithal to police their voter rolls.

California, for instance, has 11 counties with more registered voters than actual voters. Perhaps not surprisingly — it is deep-Blue State California, after all — 10 of those counties voted heavily for Hillary Clinton.

Los Angeles County, whose more than 10 million people make it the nation’s most populous county, had 12% more registered voters than live ones, some 707,475 votes. That’s a huge number of possible votes in an election.

But, Murdock notes, “California’s San Diego County earns the enchilada grande. Its 138% registration translates into 810,966 ghost voters.”

State by state, this is an enormous problem that needs to be dealt with seriously. Having so many bogus voters out there is a temptation to voter fraud. In California, where Hillary Clinton racked up a massive majority over Trump, it would have made little difference.

But in other states, and in smaller elections, voter fraud could easily turn elections. A hundred votes here, a hundred votes there, and things could be very different. As a Wikipedia list of close elections shows, since just 2000 there have been literally dozens of elections at the state, local and federal level decided by 100 votes or fewer.

And, in at least two nationally important elections in recent memory, the outcome was decided by a paper-thin margin: In 2000, President Bush beat environmental activist and former Vice President Al Gore by just 538 votes.

Sen. Al Franken, the Minnesota Democrat, won his seat by beating incumbent Sen. Norm Coleman in 2008. Coleman was initially declared the winner the day after the election, with a 726-vote lead over Franken. But after a controversial series of recounts and ballot disqualifications, Franken emerged weeks later with a 225-seat victory.

Franken’s win was enormous, since it gave Democrats filibuster-proof control of the Senate. So, yes, small vote totals matter.

We’re not saying here that Franken cheated, nor, for that matter, that Bush did. But small numbers can have an enormous impact on our nation’s governance. The 3.5 million possible fraudulent ballots that exist are a problem that deserves serious immediate attention. Nothing really hinges on it, of course, except the integrity and honesty of our democratic elections.

That’s WHY?